Ingest complete rollout lineage
Bring real world rollouts together with the dataset, annotation, evaluation, and policy versions that produced them in our cloud or inside yours.
Robot learning has no debugger. Teams can see when a robot drops a cup, misses a handoff, or fails to recover. What they cannot quickly determine is whether the failure came from missing data, bad annotations, an eval gap, a policy change, or sim to real.
The evidence is scattered across the robot learning stack, so every failure becomes a manual investigation. Teams spend weeks guessing what to collect, relabel, retrain, or redesign.
A failure happens in the real world.
Bring real world rollouts together with the dataset, annotation, evaluation, and policy versions that produced them in our cloud or inside yours.
Group recurring failure modes and replay them as repeatable tests in simulation, so teams can compare changes in hours instead of weeks.
Identify the pipeline changes most likely to have caused an improvement or regression, then decide what data to collect, relabel, retrain, or redesign.
Connect every behavior to the exact data, annotations, evals, and policy that produced it.
Group recurring failures so repeated symptoms become one tractable engineering problem.
Replay real failures as durable, repeatable digital tests.
Compare versions and see where performance actually moved.
Surface the pipeline changes most likely to explain an improvement or regression.
Run in the Run Robotics cloud or inside the customer’s cloud.

We are starting with robotics data quality.