DebuggingRobot LearningAt Scale

We make robots work by evaluating robots in real world tasks virtually and repeatably.

Robot learning has no debugger. Teams can see when a robot drops a cup, misses a handoff, or fails to recover. What they cannot quickly determine is whether the failure came from missing data, bad annotations, an eval gap, a policy change, or sim to real.

The evidence is scattered across the robot learning stack, so every failure becomes a manual investigation. Teams spend weeks guessing what to collect, relabel, retrain, or redesign.

A failure happens in the real world.

The debugging and evaluation layer for robot learning

Ingest complete rollout lineage

Bring real world rollouts together with the dataset, annotation, evaluation, and policy versions that produced them in our cloud or inside yours.

Turn failures into evaluations

Group recurring failure modes and replay them as repeatable tests in simulation, so teams can compare changes in hours instead of weeks.

Find the likely cause

Identify the pipeline changes most likely to have caused an improvement or regression, then decide what data to collect, relabel, retrain, or redesign.

Rollout lineage

Connect every behavior to the exact data, annotations, evals, and policy that produced it.

Failure clustering

Group recurring failures so repeated symptoms become one tractable engineering problem.

Simulation evals

Replay real failures as durable, repeatable digital tests.

Regression analysis

Compare versions and see where performance actually moved.

Cause ranking

Surface the pipeline changes most likely to explain an improvement or regression.

Deployment control

Run in the Run Robotics cloud or inside the customer’s cloud.

We are starting with robotics data quality.
Initial wedgeConnect datasets to measurable evaluation outcomes